![]() ![]() Intel QSV is like Nvidia, a mean, have drivers to download frecuently? if this is correct could you give me a link? driver? I though that comes with my video integrated card intel, if I get you right thre´s maybe a more recently version to download? where?Īnd I watch a video comparision and accordinar to video, the difference is the encoding time, I dont know ![]() ![]() I did not knew there´s another version of this. In all honesty, with enough bit rate, the differences between all encoders becomes negligible. It also depends on which version of NVENC we are talking about, Turing is supposed to have improved substantially over Pascal and with regards to QSV Intel is claiming that the new Comet Lake processors QSV implementation is able to beat x265+medium, not a typo, they were talking hevc not avc. ![]() Thank You in advance Loaded question, most people say that QSV is slightly better than NVENC, but it greatly depends on which version of QSV and which specific codec we are talking about I am not too crazy about QSV AVC, however I find QSV HEVC 10-bit to be excellent and I also like VAAPI VP9 (only accessible from Linux, possibly BSD). If I´ll get the same quality no matters what I use obviously I preffer laptop but because that I so like see what you say or think? I mean, on my desktop pc I can choose Nvenc and the quality on my tv led is just great, but I could do the encode with my laptop that have Intel QSV and I so need to ask you if I use Intel QSV or NVenc is just the same? I´ll get the same quality? MCEBuddy has multithreaded supported for conversions starting 2.1.2 (about 20–30% faster vs older versions)ĥ.Hi guys the thing is I currently encode some Bluray movies that I have on my collection in MKV just for put it on external hard disc and connect it to a usb port, I wonder what is better for encode? or it is the same quality? MCEBuddy has support for creating folders and renaming the output file based on the series/movie dataĤ. MCEBuddy supports multiple simultaneous convresionsģ. MCEBuddy is better at handling folder monitoring (fewer issues with files which are currently being recorded in the folder)Ģ. e.g., if ReMux fails to convert a file (it has limitations), MCEBuddy has a fallback mechanism to Remux the file (albiet it takes longer) without transcoding it.Ĭouple of additional featues that MCEBuddy has:ġ. AVI file).Īlso, the tools used by MCEBuddy and MCTV converter are exactly the same (both use a tool called ReMux) except that MCEBuddy has support more file types (MKV) and failure scenarios. The profile is called NoRecode (it repackages the remuxed. I will be testing both in the next few days and will update this article accordingly.Īs HunnyPuppy points out in the comments below, MCEBuddy 2 final is out and since 2.1.2 also does a quick remux without transcode, and has several advantagesĪctually MCEBuddy starting Release 2.1.2 also supports a simple remux without transcoding in a few minutes. Can MC-TVConverter do the same? Apparently so! Both features seem to be present. It has a folder monitoring system which automatically detects recorded files, and it has support for removal of advert breaks. MCEBuddy does have some other very useful features however. However, the ts file generated plays back perfectly! Unlike MCEBuddy, MC-TVConverter has done exactly as I hoped - it simply remuxes the streams without any transcoding of the streams. My trial only took just under 5 minutes to crunch the file, and to be honest I wasn’t very optimistic that it had worked. The file is 4.84Gig and contains H.264 and AC3 streams, and ideally I’d like a new file in ts, mkv or mp4 format which contains the same streams, unaltered. I gave this a quick trial run with a 1:05hr episode of Life recorded from BBC HD. Yesterday I discovered another free tool for converting WTV files, called MC-TVConverter. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |